Infrastructure hosting costs are always hungry for a budget and not always controllable. Moreover, the prices for the development and deployment of node infrastructure are highly dependent on the type and architecture of the project itself and require a separate budget. Unexpected traffic trends and latency spikes can add even more pepper to this dish.
Read the following article comparing different approaches in hosting blockchain infrastructure for Web3 projects—Blockchain as a Service providers, dedicated nodes, and node clusters. We’ll see how the price and feature set relate and how to make the right decision for your project.
Let’s start from the basics of what’s hidden over the price regarding blockchain infrastructure. It’s not only blockchain server cost, obviously, so we should take into account the following points:
So when we get back to our three options, we’ll get the following comparison of cost structure:
Cost Category | Baas (Naas) | Dedicated Nodes | Node Clusters |
---|---|---|---|
Initial setup | Subscription fees (if applicable); Configuration and deployment costs |
Hardware purchase (servers, networking equipment); Software licenses (if applicable) |
Hardware purchase for multiple nodes; Networking setup (switches, routers); Software licenses |
Operations | Compute instances (CPU, GPU); Storage (disk space, backups); Data transfer fees (in/out) |
Electricity for power and cooling; Internet bandwidth; Maintenance and repairs |
Electricity for power and cooling of multiple nodes; Internet bandwidth; Maintenance and repairs |
Scalability | Generally flexible; pay-as-you-go for additional resources as needed |
Significant, may require additional hardware purchases | High; similar to dedicated nodes but on a larger scale; Complex networking and management |
Maintenance and upgrades | Included in service fees; Automatic updates and patches |
Manual updates and patches; Hardware repairs and replacements |
Manual updates and patches for multiple nodes; Hardware repairs and replacements for multiple nodes |
Security and compliance | May include advanced security features at an additional cost; Compliance features may be included |
Investment in security software and hardware; Compliance management costs |
Investment in security solutions for a cluster;
Compliance management costs for multiple nodes |
Hidden payments | API requests beyond the free tier; Higher-tier services for improved performance |
Redundancy and backup systems; Energy cost fluctuations |
Complex system management and troubleshooting; Redundancy and backup systems for reliability |
These are unavoidable costs for any Web3 project. And you can see that the sum you’ll pay changes dramatically depending on the choice. But it’s not enough to select a cheaper variant here, so we’ll discover other features to find the infrastructure setup option that fits your case.
There are no cheap options for blockchain cost. But the packs of services, skills, and specialists you may need to maintain this or that type of infrastructure, and the list of inherited processes varies greatly.
Feature | SaaS Nodes | Dedicated Nodes | Node Clusters |
---|---|---|---|
Hardware requirements | Not applicable; provided and managed by the service. | High-performance servers, storage solutions, networking equipment. | Clustered servers, storage systems, high-bandwidth networking. |
Software requirements | Provider-specific; typically includes access to a web interface. | OS licenses, virtualization software, monitoring tools. | Container orchestration tools (e.g., Kubernetes), cluster management software. |
Scalability | Scalable, limited by the provider's offer. | Scalable, primarily manual, limited by physical resources. | Dynamic scaling using orchestration tools; supports auto-scaling policies. |
Security technologies | Standardized security protocols; limited customization. | Complete control over security implementations (e.g., firewalls, IDS/IPS). | Requires complex security setup (e.g., network policies, service meshes). |
Data operations | Internal storage solutions under the data handling policies. | Self-managed on-premise databases or separate data center storage solutions; complete control. | Distributed storage systems, data replication, and backup strategies; complete control. |
Customization | Low | High | Highest |
Performance | Depends on the provider; may vary. | Predictable performance; not shared with others. | Can be optimized for high performance. |
Other existing approaches for infrastructure for Web3 projects include containerized solutions, managed node services, and other custom infrastructures. Dysnix has also worked on this dilemma and has concluded that self-hosted blockchain nodes are the unique solution that may fit everyone. Thus, RPC Fast appeared.
We say it for the following reasons:
To forge the iron while it’s hot, we leave you a hint about the cost of this solution below.
We’ve made you a short cheat sheet based on these simple conclusions:
Remember the option of self-hosted nodes we’ve mentioned, and choose wisely!