High-frequency trading (HFT) has always been a race against time. But today, it's not just about smarter algorithms—it's about the invisible machines that run behind them.
Infrastructure—the servers, the networks, the hidden communication layers—now decides who catches the best trades and who misses them by milliseconds. In an environment where a tiny delay can wipe out entire opportunities, the need for ultra-fast, resilient, and intelligent systems is no longer optional. It's survival.
This article explores how HFT infrastructure is built and what makes it microsecond-efficient. We explore how dedicated clusters, real-time blockchain feeds, and private transaction routing have redefined what "fast" really means.
When traders think about speed, it’s tempting to imagine better internet connections or slightly faster algorithms making the difference.
In reality, a distinct speed in HFT is rooted much deeper: at the level of cables, server architecture, networking stacks, and transaction routing. The milliseconds you seek come from HFT-centric infrastructure, not software.
Every trade starts with a signal moving across a physical network. The quality of that network defines how quickly the signal arrives.
Public internet routes, even over fiber, can introduce unpredictable latency. A cross-region transmission between major hubs can easily accumulate ~60 milliseconds, with additional jitter from routing changes, congestion, and queuing at intermediate nodes. For an HFT strategy, that’s forever.
In professional setups, public paths are abandoned in favor of:
Even within private networks, traders optimize TCP stack parameters, minimize packet handshake overhead, and sometimes replace TCP with custom UDP protocols tuned for their flow.
At the highest level, it’s not about having “good internet”—it’s about owning the physical path your packets take.
In the example above, the FPGA modules process market data and orders directly via high-speed Ethernet and PCIe interfaces.
In HFT, the server becomes part of the reaction chain itself. Consistency, low-latency behavior, and predictable execution matter far more than raw CPU power.
The best HFT servers are tuned for:
Advanced setups also fine-tune their OS settings: disabling interrupt coalescing on network cards, enforcing CPU affinity (binding processes to specific cores), and stripping down the OS to eliminate background noise.
A server misconfigured at this level can quietly introduce 100–200 microseconds of delay, enough to completely miss fast-moving opportunities on the market.
Even if a transaction is generated instantly, it still has to reach its destination faster than everyone else’s.
In blockchain trading, for example, sending a transaction to a public RPC endpoint or mempool exposes it to thousands of bots. Those bots can observe pending transactions and race you to the execution, causing slippage or outright loss of the opportunity.
To avoid this, professional HFT setups use:
On Solana specifically, a difference of just 3–5 slots (about 1.2–2 seconds) in transaction landing time can make the difference between securing a profitable arbitrage and being left behind at a loss.
The goal of routing is clear: get to the block producer faster and minimize exposure.
Let's look at real-world HFT cases where infrastructure made the difference. These examples show how the right setup can turn milliseconds into market-winning trades.
Some examples:
When summed across thousands of micro-opportunities daily, these small disadvantages snowball into millions in lost profit. Thus, HFT boosts liquidity and efficiency but also reduces human control and can amplify market volatility.
Today, HFT players operate on a spectrum of infrastructure solutions. Some rely on slightly optimized public systems, others invest millions into private clusters designed for near-instantaneous execution.
At the core, the main types of HFT infrastructure look like this:
Type | Key features | Typical latency | Main risks |
---|---|---|---|
Public RPCs / APIs | Shared with thousands of users. No control over traffic priority or congestion. | High (variable 200ms–1s+) | High variability, unpredictable delays, exposure to front-running. |
Dedicated Nodes / Clusters | Private servers tuned for ultra-low latency, direct network paths, customized optimizations. | Low (sub-100ms ideal) | Cost, need for expertise or managed provider. |
Direct Validator / Exchange Access | Bypass public routes, submit transactions directly to validators or brokers. | Very Low (sub-50ms) | Hard to obtain, requires deep partnerships and constant maintenance. |
Each option reflects a tradeoff between speed, control, and cost.
Public RPC endpoints—including free or paid Solana/Ethereum RPC providers—were never built for HFT purposes. They are suitable for normal user wallets, casual bots, or applications that don’t require instant settlement.
In an HFT context, depending on public RPCs is almost equivalent to playing a lottery: you may succeed occasionally, but losses over time will erode any systematic advantage.
Dedicated clusters and nodes move trading to a different level.
By isolating your traffic, removing noisy neighbors, optimizing network routing (including connecting to stake-weighted relays like bloXroute), and tuning servers for minimal packet delay, dedicated infrastructure can reduce round-trip transaction times by factors of 5-10x compared to public options.
At the highest end of the spectrum are setups that go even further: colocating servers in the same physical data centers as validators or trading venues, setting up dark fiber connections, and negotiating direct order submission agreements.
These strategies unlock sub-50ms performance but usually involve high capital investment, regulatory complexities, and operational overhead, placing them in reach of only the largest institutional players.
If building your own private validator network is unrealistic, the next best step is to find infrastructure that comes as close as possible, offering near-instant data, private transaction delivery, and consistency under pressure.
This is exactly the philosophy behind the trading node clusters we developed at RPC Fast.
Instead of just providing "another Solana node" or a basic endpoint, our approach is different.
We engineered a full-stack solution tailored for HFT, combining multiple latency-reduction and reliability layers in one system, without hidden costs or extra subscriptions.
Every RPC Fast Solana trading node includes:
Importantly, all these technologies are included as part of the service—no separate contracts, no add-on costs.
Our partnership with bloXroute allows us to integrate their Order Flow Relay (OFR) and Trading API features directly into the infrastructure at no extra charge to clients.
This matters because most competitors either:
Benchmarked performance confirms this difference. Solana trading nodes by RPC Fast consistently achieve:
Metric | RPC Fast Solana trading node |
---|---|
P90 transaction confirmation time | ~1.4 seconds |
P90 slot landing | +3 slots from target |
Transaction landing success rate | ~99% |
These results are not theoretical, but provided by RPC Fast engineers.
In practice, it means that when your algorithm sees an opportunity and fires a transaction, that transaction will be among the first to reach the validator, maximizing your chance of execution before the market moves.
Unlike public RPC services, where unpredictable congestion can add 300–500ms delay, or shared "fast" RPCs where slot placement is a gamble, dedicated HFT nodes at RPC Fast guarantee you are operating with infrastructure designed to win races, not just participate in them.
If you want to explore this setup further, you can check the full specifications and technical details.
Magneto Labs approached us with a familiar problem: their high-frequency Solana trading strategies were hitting a ceiling.
Despite smart logic and precise signals, transactions were consistently landing 4–6 slots late, far beyond profitable windows on decentralized markets. Their infrastructure, built on fast shared RPCs, simply couldn’t keep up during peak volatility. Missed fills, rising slippage, and unpredictable latency were eating directly into profits.
They didn’t need more computing power. They needed another quality of infrastructure to achieve, guaranteeing deterministic, low-latency execution.
Together with the Magneto team, we built and launched a high-availability Solana cluster optimized for HFT workloads. The stack included:
All components were fully containerized, orchestrated with Kubernetes, and delivered with pre-configured routes across multiple latency-optimized regions. No engineering on their side. No third-party layers. Just execution, as promised.
Within the first two weeks:
Magneto didn’t change their strategy—only their infrastructure. However, the performance boost opened new trading windows that had previously been unreachable due to latency walls.
Now, their team runs confidently during peak volatility, knowing they’re no longer competing for bandwidth or RPC time—they own their lane.
While the principles of high-frequency trading are clear—speed, consistency, protection—the way infrastructure providers deliver these capabilities varies dramatically.
Some focus purely on speed at the expense of transaction security. Others build in protection but sacrifice raw latency. Choosing the right partner means understanding these tradeoffs in real numbers, not just marketing claims.
Here’s a high-level view of how major HFT infrastructure options compare today:
Provider | P90 latency | Slot landing | Front-running protection | Key notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
RPCFast (dedicated nodes) | ~1.4s | +3 slots | Yes (when using "protected/balanced" mode) | Includes Jito ShredStream, bloXroute OFR, full flexibility in execution. |
Temporal / Nozomi | ~1.9s | +4 slots | No | Focus on stake-weighted routing, good raw speed, limited protection. |
Jito Direct | ~2.1s | +4 slots | Yes (Jito-only validators) | Excellent for protection, speed varies depending on validator set. |
NextBlock RPC | ~3.0s | +6 slots | No | Public multi-region RPC; faster than average, but not HFT-grade. |
DIY in-house clusters | Varies (can be faster) | Varies | Customizable | Highest potential, but requires heavy investment, engineering, and maintenance. |
Consider this: if your transaction lands even two slots later on Solana—roughly 800 milliseconds—you’re already reacting to a stale market.
Arbitrage spreads tighten, liquidity dries up, and price impact worsens.
Infrastructure that simply looks "fast" on average latency charts may still lose you the critical race inside the block pipeline itself.
RPCFast’s combined use of private infrastructure, ShredStream feeds, and bloXroute relays directly targets this bottleneck.
Reducing confirmation times and slot drift increases the percentage of trades that fill at intended conditions, turning theoretical strategies into actual P&L.
For high-frequency traders, the choice isn’t just about saving milliseconds.
It’s about reliably turning information into action before anyone else can—block after block, day after day.
High-frequency trading is about execution—the invisible half of the race, where infrastructure makes all the difference. Milliseconds lost in public networks, slow servers, or inefficient routing don’t show up immediately on a P&L chart.
They accumulate quietly, trade by trade, opportunity by opportunity—until they define the boundary between consistent winners and everyone else.
Today, professional HFT setups demand more than just “good enough” connections. They require dedicated systems designed to minimize every source of friction: from packet travel times to slot confirmation delays to market data freshness.
At RPCFast, we built our high-frequency trading nodes around this reality.
Dedicated clusters. Priority transaction routing. Real-time ShredStream access. No compromises on speed, no hidden bottlenecks.
All tuned, maintained, and supported by a team that knows what trading at 400ms block speeds actually requires.
If you're serious about staying ahead of the markets—not just reacting to them—the right infrastructure isn't a luxury anymore.
Explore how RPCFast Solana Trading Nodes can give you the edge where it matters most. Learn more here or talk to our engineers about your custom setup.