
Recently, we hosted a private session with OVHcloud and ~20 fast‑growing startups. Among attendees, we were pleased to welcome payment services, L1/cross-chain projects, compliance & security innovators, and AI-powered teams. The talk was splendid and brought a mass of insights for all the participants.
These Web3 teams face the same hurdles in 2025: spikes that break autoscalers, fraud and compliance latency that blocks revenue, GPU scarcity and spend creep, and bridges or validators that stall under load. Market dynamics amplify this. Chain upgrades and L2 expansions compress finality budgets. Regulators tighten audit expectations. AI-driven products raise user latency expectations to sub‑100 ms.

In a nutshell, we compared what breaks first in Web3 stacks and what protects revenue. The winners had a simple pattern. Keep critical flows fast and isolated. Scale the parts that face customers. Set clear targets for latency, uptime, and recovery. Measure cost from the very beginning, and where it matters the most.

The shortest conclusions of our expertise-sharing session are as follows:
Read further to dive into the details of our workshop. We remade it into a practical guide your team can execute without changing your product roadmap.
We move straight to the point while discussing infrastructure, and that’s why the flaws of infrastructure stand behind the challenges of our clients. That’s the problem that’s easily cured with a list of simple migration or upgrading actions:
| Project type | Main pain points | Infra cures | 
|---|---|---|
| Payment services | Slow or failed checkouts. One region dependency. Bot abuse. | Ledger on fast dedicated servers. APIs on Kubernetes. Private networking. Load balancer with WAF and rate limits. Two active regions. Tracing on every payment. | 
| L1 and cross-chain | Finality lag. Bridge outages. Hard rollbacks. | Validators on tuned dedicated servers. Sentry layer. Two or more relayers. Fast snapshots. Rollback by block height. Clear SLOs for lag and missed blocks. | 
| Compliance, security, fraud | Slow risk checks. False positives. Weak audit trail. | Streaming risk pipeline on Kubernetes. Private data paths. Multi-source intel with quorum. Tamper-evident logs. Long-term retention. | 
| AI startups | GPU waste. Latency spikes. Unknown model cost. | Training on a dedicated GPU. Inference on Kubernetes GPU pools. Vector DB on fast storage. Prescaling by demand forecast. Per-model spend and SLO budgets. | 
 Map your gaps to revenue, trust, and regulatory exposure. Then pick the cures your team can deliver in weeks. Make these cures concrete with budgets, e.g., auth p95 under 100 ms.
Map your gaps to revenue, trust, and regulatory exposure. Then pick the cures your team can deliver in weeks. Make these cures concrete with budgets, e.g., auth p95 under 100 ms.
Other examples of numbers you might like to track while improving your infrastructure:
Tie alerts to budgets. If latency, errors, or lag cross the line, autoscale or shed load before users feel it.

You scale faster and with less effort when you remove waste and keep p95 stable. Measure cost next to SLOs and act before users feel it.

These are the levers that keep p99 flat while QPS grows.

Security and compliance are load‑bearing. Treat them as engineering constraints with budgets and gates, not checklists on a slide. And maybe our advice here is debatable, and there are other ways of implementing DevSecOps, but the best practices are as follows:
Attach business metrics to drills. Track revenue at risk per minute during failovers. This keeps investment focused.
Stuck performance and rising incidents often trace back to the wrong platform mix, noisy neighbors, or one-region designs. Migration fixes root causes when tuning hits a wall. Treat it as an engineered, low-downtime program with clear business goals: sub-100 ms on critical flows, 99.99% uptime, and lower $/1k requests.

 Execution matters. A senior infra team sequences cutovers, runs shadow traffic, proves RTO/RPO in drills, and retires old paths on schedule.
Execution matters. A senior infra team sequences cutovers, runs shadow traffic, proves RTO/RPO in drills, and retires old paths on schedule.Disclaimer: Provider inventories and prices change. Validate region latency, GPU stock, and egress before committing.
| Project type | Critical workloads | Recommended OVHcloud setup | Alternative notes | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Payment services | Auth, risk scoring, ledger, RPC gateway | Bare Metal for ledger DBs on NVMe; vRack private network; Managed K8s for APIs/risk; IP Load Balancer with WAF/rate limits; Object Storage for receipts/logs; Dual regions. | AWS EC2 Bare Metal + NLB/WAF, EBS io2 (watch egress). Hetzner dedicated NVMe + Load Balancer (validate DDoS posture). | 
| L1 and cross-chain | Validators / sequencer, sentries, relayers, RPC, indexers | High-frequency Bare Metal with pinned CPU/NUMA, NVMe RAID; vRack mesh; Sentry architecture; K8s for relayers/indexers; Golden images/snapshots. | AWS i4i.metal/c7gd.metal, ENA, Local NVMe; Hetzner AX/MX NVMe (verify tail latency/NIC queues). | 
| Compliance / security / fraud | Stream pipeline, feature store, API gateway, SIEM | K8s for stream processing; vRack private data paths; Managed DB with encryption; Logs Data Platform + Managed Grafana; Object Storage with retention. | AWS MSK/Kinesis + PrivateLink + Shield; Hetzner K8s + self-hosted ELK and edge WAF. | 
| AI startups | Online inference, training, vector search | Bare Metal GPU for training; K8s GPU node pools for inference; Local NVMe/Block for features; Object Storage for models; Prometheus/Grafana for per-model SLO/cost. | AWS P/T family GPUs + EKS; Hetzner GPU availability varies (confirm supply, add taints/quotas). | 
Choose providers by workload, not logo.
Use this as your go/no‑go gate. If an item is red, delay the launch.
 Assign owners for each item and a link to the proof. Export the evidence bundle before launch.
Assign owners for each item and a link to the proof. Export the evidence bundle before launch.The game changers we offered to you are pragmatic. Dedicated NVMe servers for critical state stabilize p99 and reduce failure blast radius. Kubernetes gives elastic scale for public edges without idle burn. Private networking contains jitter and abuse. Fast snapshots with deterministic rollback cut recovery from hours to minutes. For AI, GPU pool isolation and per‑model cost/SLO guardrails keep demos sharp and margins healthy.

None of these ships by accident. It needs a senior team that thinks in SLOs, treats security as code, rehearses failover, and reads kernel and network signals when incidents hit. Most startups lack that bench during hypergrowth, which is where specialists pay back fast.

RPC Fast and Dysnix bring that bench. We place hot paths on the right metal, keep edges elastic, wire budgets to alerts, and leave you with clear runbooks.
If you want speed without surprises, bring us in early for an architecture review or a focused infra briefing.


